![]() I think this is why Rowling has so much more humor than does Tolkien. As Harry, Ron, and Hermione grow up, the story becomes more appropriate for adolescents and young adults. The Lord of the Rings is an epic tale and so more in tune with the tragic dimension of life.Īs a coming of age story, Harry Potter is necessarily geared to a younger audience than Tolkien, and, at least in the earlier volumes, is at the level of intelligent older children. Harry Potter is also a coming of age story and shows a marked preoccupation with death. They are both fantasy literature, have a deep concern with the dangers of power, and share a typically British appreciation for normal life. The similarities between Tolkien’s and Rowling’s works are obvious. We desperately need to hear Tolkien in order to avoid the errors of moralism and a simplistic faith that cannot withstand the tidal waves of disappointment in the face of the hiddenness of God. That shortcoming, however, is one that much Christian thinking about God and evil shares. ![]() Nevertheless, Rowling falls short at a crucial point. ![]() Taking into account the facts that Tolkien’s masterpiece is the standard for fantasy literature and that Rowling is writing a slightly different genre and for a different audience, Harry Potter holds up fairly well. ![]() Harry Potter Part II: The Good and the Not So GoodĪ good way to evaluate Harry Potter is to compare it to Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings trilogy. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |